Link with 1 note
Among the most interesting things about criticism are the possibilities to make the critique its own little work of art. This is the most successful I’ve seen in a while; a review of a game where you repeat things over and over, slightly differently each time, that reads like the game plays. Brilliant.
The useful element of this sort of criticism isn’t that the fact that people in the status quo don’t like your idea. Of course they don’t. The interesting question is: what about the world as it is would have to change for your idea to be important?